THE
RL1908 BLOG
News,
Reviews & Opinion - Sean
Fagan - RL1908.com
|
SHOULD THE RUGBY CODES MERGE? |
It comes up every winter, someone pops up with
the question: "Should the rugby codes
merge? A merged code could swamp Australian rules
and challenge soccer globally."
Of
course, the simple reply to that is to point out
that a merged rugby code is, in effect, a third
rugby code.
Unless
Union and League are made obsolete in the process
of creating a hybrid rugby,and no one keeps those
codes alive, all it will do is dilute support
for the two existing rugby codes, producing the
opposite result i.e. less support for Union and
League.
|

Arthur
Hennessy - pioneer of rugby league (Souths
& Australia) - played and coached both
rugby codes. |
Looking
at the question from the rugby league side of
the fence, how can a merger be anything other
than a takeover of League by Union?
League's
strength is its two pro club competitions (notwithstanding
that most of us would like to see the international
game thriving).
While
soccer has the balance between club and country
fixtures seemingly about right, Union is dominated
by international fixtures.
In
a merged rugby code, surely the international
game would be even more prominent than it currently
is in RU - all of which would make club competitions
secondary in importance.
The
lifeblood of rugby league is week to week club
footy.
In
Australia, the merged code's club competition
would be like the annual Origin period - 6 weeks
of NRL games competing with rep footy for interest,
along with with depleted club teams, and as a
result, depleted interest from fans (crowds &
TV).
All
I could see a rugby merger doing is killing off
interest in the NRL (or whatever its merged rugby
equivalent is called), and giving AFL an open
shot at national domination for the week to week
club scene.
Where
would rugby league gain anything from merging?
(Unless the merged rules were RL rules).
If
RU has been unable to challenge soccer as a global
sport, how will RL merging with RU make it any
more likely? As we are told ad nauseum,
RL only trumps RU in pockets of Australia and
England.
No
doubt though, until such time as players stop
swapping rugby codes, as long as one/both codes
use the word "rugby" in its name, and
whilever rugby league still has scrums, talk of
merging codes will continue to arise.
American
football, Canadian football and Australian rules
football, all have their origins in Rugby football
- bereft of the word "rugby" in their
names, no one ever speculates that any of these
codes should merge back with rugby.
Interestingly,
while the codes themselves aren't merging, there
seems to be a growing sentiment amongst rugby
league players in particular, that RL and RU are
essentially one sport, and they'll go wherever
the best opportunities for themselves are.

|