The
"Grand Final"
Sean Fagan of RL1908.com
The
origin of "Grand Final"
is lost in the past,
but the tradition of using "Grand" to
describe the most prestigous of sporting events
can be traced back to Sydney in the 1860s.
When
you think about it, why has rugby league in Australia
historically had a Final, and then a "Grand
Final"? Shouldn't there simply be one "Final"?
Victorian/Australian
rules also uses these terms. Yet, nowhere else
in the world seems to have "Grand Finals"
(except rugby league in England, which adopted
the Australian use).
The
first use of "Grand Final" appears to
lay somewhere in the years around World War One
(though it may be as recent as the 1930s).
Using
"Grand" to describe a sporting event
is far older.
Despite AFL historians claiming their code invented
the idea of a "Grand Final" and play-offs,
examination of Sydney and Melbourne newspapers
from the 1890s and early 1900s (up to 1910) revealed
no mention of "Grand Final" matches
in either code. The AFL claim also ignores that
play-off systems were in earlier use in sports
in England and the USA, and in the 1890s in Sydney
rugby union.
In
the early 1900s in Sydney, in League and Union,
semi-finals worked on a system that used a continuation
of the regular season points table. As a result,
a Final was only required when the top two clubs
were within two points of each other after the
semi-finals.
If they were within one point of each other, a
win in the Final (and therefore another two points
gained) would see one team claim the premiership.
However, in cases where the second team was two
points behind, if they won the Final the two clubs
would be on the same points tally. This would
require a second Final to split the clubs.
When
a "second Final" was required, it was
not referred to as anything other than a "Final"
in the newspapers, including advertisements. There
was no mention of "Grand Final".
However, the use of the word "grand"
was commonly used to describe what we might today
called "great" or "spectacular"
events. For example, "grand event to close
the season" was used in advertising for a
Final. Well back into the 1800s, "a grand
football match may be anticipated" was a
relatively common phrase in newspapers for major
games. The word "grandstand" has similar
origins - the great or large stand.
Maintaining the quaint term "Grand Final"
(instead of say, "Super Bowl"), provides
a direct linkage back the first major sporting
events of our colonial past. In 1862, the first
ever match of an England cricket team in Sydney
was described as "The Grand Cricket Match".
"The
Grand Cricket Match"
All England XI v.
22 of N.S.Wales
Sydney Domain
January 1862 |
"Grand
Final" first came into common use under the
"right-of-challenge" system adopted
at various times by rugby league and Victorian
rules in the first decades of the 1900s. A minor
premier beaten in a semi-final or final could
still win the premiership via a "Grand Final".
In many seasons, a "Grand Final" did
not eventuate.
In
stage plays, the final act was also known as the
"grand finale", where all the
actors return to the stage, and there was great
excitement and emotion. It is not difficult to
equate that with the (absolute) final match of
the season, where the minor premiers and the challenger
are to perform for the prize.
The
claims of the VFL/AFL that it has been playing
Grand Finals annually since 1896 are somewhat
loose. They have decided to treat all years that
just had a Final (and 1924 there were none), as
having a "Grand Final" - hence they
say the 2008 Grand Final was the 112th in-a-row.
In reality, a Grand Final requires a Final to
precede it for the term to be correctly used.
It
was not until the play-off systems included a
mandatory end-of-season decider that the "Grand
Final" became a permanent fixture. In the
VFL this was 1931, and in the NSWRL 1954.
|